|
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
BIOLOGICAL
CHRONOLOGICAL
GEOGRAPHICAL
GEOLOGICAL
HISTORICAL
|
|
Remote
Sensing
Source: Berlin, G.
L. 1998. The Remote Sensing Pages. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~geog-p/geog/RemoteSensing/.
1/13/01.
Remote sensing is defined as the technique of obtaining information about
objects through the analysis of data collected by special instruments
that are not in physical contact with the objects of investigation. As
such, remote sensing can be regarded as "reconnaissance from a distance,"
"teledetection," or a form of the common adage "look but
don't touch." Remote sensing thus differs from in situ sensing,
where the instruments are immersed in, or physically touch, the objects
of measurement. A common examples of an in situ instrument is
the soil thermometer.
Traditionally, the energy collected and measured in remote sensing has
been electromagnetic radiation, including visible light and invisible
thermal infrared (heat) energy, which is reflected or emitted in varying
degrees by all natural and synthetic objects. The scope of remote sensing
has been recently broadened to include acoustical or sound energy, which
is propagated under water. With the inclusion of these two different forms
of energy, the human eye and ear are examples of remote sensing data collection
devices.

Source: http://www.for.nau.edu/geography/RemoteSensing/images/wavelength.jpg
The instruments used for this special technology are known as remote
sensors and include photographic cameras, mechanical scanners, and imaging
radar systems. Regardless of type, they are designed to both collect and
record specific types of energy that impinges upon them. Remote sensing
devices can be differentiated in terms of whether they are active or passive.
Active systems, such as radar and sonar, beam artificially produced energy
to a target and record the reflected component. Passive systems, including
the photographic camera, detect only energy emanating naturally from an
object, such as reflected sunlight or thermal infrared emissions. Today,
remote sensors, excluding sonar devices, are typically carried on aircraft
and earth-orbiting spacecraft, which has led to the familiar phrase "eye
in the sky." Sonar systems propagate acoustical energy through water
for the reconnaissance of subaqueous features.
To complete the remote sensing process, the data captured and recorded
by remote sensing systems must be analyzed by interpretive and measurement
techniques in order to provide useful information about the subjects of
investigation. These techniques are diverse, ranging from traditional
methods of visual interpretation to methods using sophisticated computer
processing. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that data is not information.
Accordingly, the two major components of remote sensing are data capture
and data analysis."
The Need For A Name
By the early 1960s, many new types of remote sensing devices were being
introduced that could detect electromagnetic radiation in spectral regions
far beyond the range of human vision and photographic film. This was also
a time when many in the scientific community had great hopes for earth
observations from orbiting satellites on a routine basis. To encompass
these concepts, the term "remote sensing" was coined by Evelyn
L. Pruitt, a geographer formerly with the Office of Naval Research, to
replace the more limiting terms "aerial" and "photograph".
The new term, promoted throughout a series of symposia at the Willow Run
Laboratories of the University of Michigan, gained immediate and widespread
acceptance.
Although the term remote sensing has a recent origin, the technique has
been used by humans since the dawn of our history. Every time we sense
our surroundings with out eye-brain system we are determining the size,
shape, and color of objects from a distance by collecting and analyzing
reflected visible light. In a similar manner, certain poisonous snakes
use special heat sensors to perceive impressions of their surrounding
environment, and bats use sound echoes to navigate and detect prey.
For more information on the Remote Sensing Program
at Northern Arizona University, contact G.
L. Berlin.
For a discussion of how remote sensing techniques
are being used in archaeological studies, including studies at Chaco
Canyon on the Colorado Plateau, click here.
Resources:
Allen, C. D., Betancourt, J. L. and Swetnam, T. W. 1998. Landscape changes
in the southwestern United States: Techniques, long-term data sets and
trends. Pp. 71-84 In: Sisk, T. D., editor. Perspectives on the
land use history of North America: A context for understanding our changing
environment. Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-1998-0003. U.S.
Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Reston, VA.
Baker, V. R. 1987. Fluvial paleohydrology of the southern Colorado Plateau,
Arizona and Utah. Pp. 18-19 In: Hawkins, R. H., Wobber, F. J. and
Springer, E. P., editors. Remote sensing-arid lands workshop. U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, D.C.
Berlin, G. L., Ambler, R., Hevly, R. H. and Schaber, G. G. 1977. Identification
of a Sinagua agricultural field by aerial thermography, soil chemistry,
pollen/plant analysis, and archaeology. American Antiquity 42:
588-600.
Ellenwood, J. R. 1994. Monitoring long-term change of vegetation with
historical inventories on the Kaibab National Forest. In: Greer,
J. D., editor. Remote sensing and ecosystem management: Proceedings
of the fifth Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference.
American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Portland, OR.
Everitt, J. H. and Deloach, C. J. 1990. Remote sensing of Chinese tamarisk
(Tamarix chinensis) and associated vegetation. Weed Science
38: 273-278.
Everitt, J. H., Escobar, D. E. and Alaniz, M. A. 1996. Using spatial
information technologies to map Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis)
infestations. Weed Science 44: 194-201.
Hewitt, M. J., III 1990. Synoptic inventory of riparian ecosystems: The
utility of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Forest Ecology and Management
33/34: 605.
Johnson, L. B. 1990. Analyzing spatial and temporal phenomena using geographic
information systems: A review of ecological applications. Landscape
Ecology 4: 31-43.
Kasischke, E. S., Melack, J. M. and Dobson, M. C. 1997. The use of imaging
radars for ecological applications - a review. Remote Sensing of Environment
59: 141.
Lee, K. 1988. Remote sensing study in support of mineral resource
appraisal of Wilderness Study Areas near Moab, Utah. U.S. Geological
Survey, Denver, CO.
Lee, C. T. and Marsh, S. E. 1995. The use of archival Landsat MSS and
ancillary data in a GIS environment to map historical change in an urban
riparian habitat. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61:
999-1008.
Liedtke, J., Roberts, A. and Luternauer, J. 1995. Practical remote sensing
of suspended sediment concentrations. Photogrammetric Engineering and
Remote Sensing 61: 167-176.
Loose, R. W. and Lyons, T. R. 1976. The Chetro Ketl field: A planned
water control system in Chaco Canyon. Pp. 13-36 In: Lyons, T. R.,
editor. Remote sensing experiments in cultural resource studies: Non-destructive
methods of archaeological exploration, survey, and analysis. Reports
of the Chaco Center, No. 1. Chaco Center, National Park Service and University
of New Mexico, Albuquerqure.
Loveland, T. R. and Hutcheson, H. L. 1995. Monitoring changes in landscapes
from satellite imagery. Pp. 530 In: LaRoe, E. T., Farris, G. S.,
Puckett, C. E., Doran, P. D. and M.J. Mac, editors. Our living resources:
A report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S.
plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C.
Lyons, T. R., editor. 1976. Remote sensing experiments in cultural
resource studies: Non-destructive methods of archaeological exploration,
survey and analysis. Reports of the Chaco Center, No. 1. Chaco Center,
National Park Service, and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Mattikalli, N. M., DeVereux, B. J. and Richards, K. S. 1996. Prediction
of river discharge and surface water quality using an integrated geographical
information system approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing
17: 683.
National Park Service 1997. Baseline water quality data inventory
and analysis: Chaco Culture National Historical Park. National Parks
Service, Water Resouces Division, Fort Collins, CO, 291 pp.
Nemani, R. and Running, S. 1997. Land cover characterization using multitemporal
red, near-IR and thermal-IR data from NOAA/AVHRR. Ecological Applications
7: 79-90.
Potter, L. D. and Kelley, N. E. 1980. Aerial photointerpretation of vegetation
of Chaco Canyon National Monument. In: Cultural resources remote sensing.
Cultural Resources Management Division, National Park Service, Washington,
D.C.
Price, K. P. 1993. Detection of soil erosion within pinyon-juniper woodlands
using thematic mapper (TM) data. Remote Sensing of Environment 45:
233-248.
Pucherelli, M. J. 1986. Evaluation of riparian vegetative trends in
the Grand Canyon using multitemporal remote sensing techniques. USBR,
Salt Lake City, UT.
Quattrochi, D. A. and Pelletier, R. E. 1991. Remote sensing for analysis
of landscapes: An introduction. Pp. 17-76 In: Turner and Gardner,
editors. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag,
New York.
Ramsey, R. D., Born, J. D., Homer, C. G. and Edwards, T. C., Jr. 1992.
Thematic mapper vegetation mapping for the state of Utah. Pp. 148-157
In: Greer, J. D., editor. Remote sensing and natural resource management.
American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
Ramsey, R. D., Homer, C. G. and Edwards, T. C., Jr. 1993. Gap analysis
land cover map for the state of Utah: A hierarchiacal data base. Pp.
298-306 In: GIS, photogrammetry and modeling: Looking to the future with
an eye on the past. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
Ramsey, R. D., Falconer, A. and Jensen, J. R. 1995. The relationship
between NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and ecoregions in Utah. Remote Sensing of Environment
53: 188-198.
Sample, V. A., editor. 1994. Remote sensing and GIS in ecosystem management.
Island Press, Washington, D.C., 369 pp.
Sever, Tom. Archaeological Remote Sensing at Chaco Canyon, New Mexico.
http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/archeology/remote_sensing.html
9/23/99.
USGS/EROS. 2001 Earth Observing System. http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome/.
1/13/01.
Van West, C. R. 1991. Reconstructing prehistoric climatic variability
and agricultural production in southwestern Colorado, A.D. 901-1300: A
GIS approach. Pp. 25-34 In: Hutchinson, A., Smith, J. E. and Usher,
J., editors. Proceedings of the Anasazi Symposium 1991. Mesa Verde
Museum Association, Inc., Mesa Verde, CO.
Wagner, D. 1991. Analysis of prehistoric roadways in Chaco Canyon using
remotely sensed digital data. In: Trombold, C., editor. Ancient
road networks and settlement hierarchies in the New World. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, MA.
|